Nirja Khatuwala Vs ITO (ITAT Gauhati) I note that the out of total outstanding credits of Rs. 2,23,89,337/-[total number of sundry creditors were eleven (11)], the Assessing Officer was not satisfied about the genuinity in respect of credit worth Rs. 34,35,509/- i.e. only in respect of three sundry creditors which comes to 16% of total […]
As the NAV for the switch out (redemption/repurchase) transaction in a liquid scheme for the request received before the cut-off timing on Friday or on a day preceding a non-business day would be the closing NAV of the day immediately preceding the next business day, therefore, the NAV applicable for the coinciding switch in (subscription) transaction should not be prior to the day of NAV applicable for the switch out transaction. Therefore, in such case, the applicable NAV for the switch in transaction would be as per the applicable provisions, treating the switch in request as received on the day when NAV of switch out transaction is applicable.
In Re. Mr. Prannoy Roy & Mrs. Radhika Roy (SEBI) It is a fact on record that Mr. Prannoy Roy was the Managing Director/Promoter and Mrs. Radhika Roy was the Chairman/Promoter of NDTV during the UPSI period and were in possession of the UPSI (PSI-6). That the Noticees have purchased 4835850 shares of NDTV while […]
Eminent Computers Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) The issue under consideration is whether the re-opening of assessment u/s 147 merely relying upon investigation report is justified in law? ITAT states that the return of income filed by the assessee has also been analyzed with reference to the information received from the Investigation Wing and […]
Notification No. 63/2020-Customs (N.T./CAA/DRI) [S.O. 4468(E).], Dated: 27.11.2020- Appointment of Common Adjudicating Authority MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS) (DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE) New Delhi, the 27th November, 2020 Notification No. 63/2020-Customs (N.T./CAA/DRI) S.O. 4468(E).—In pursuance of notification No. 60/2015-Customs (N.T.), published vide number G.S.R. 453(E), dated 4th […]
Parveen Kumar Bansal Vs Sternal Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) We have carefully considered the Report furnished by the DGAP, the submissions made by the Respondent and the other material placed on record. On examining the various submissions, the observations of this Authority are as follows:- a) The DGAP, in Para 16 of his report, has […]
In re Beumer India Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAAR Haryana) Sub-Section (2) of Section 56 of Income Tax Act 1961 taxes sums received under the Head ‘Income from Other Sources’. Clause (vii)(a) of sub-section (2) of Section 56 includes the sum of money where it exceeds Rupees 50000/- received by an Individual or an HUF without […]
It would appear that, in the meanwhile, between the date of apprehending the goods at the parcel office and the date on which the order of detention was passed, the e-way bill had already been updated by filling the Part B thereof. This is evident from Ext.P6 that is produced along with the writ petition.
The insurance service provided by the Deposit Insurance Corporation to the banks is an ‘input service’ and CENVAT credit of service tax paid for this service received by the banks from the Deposit Insurance Corporation can be availed by the banks for rendering ‘output services’.
Notwithstanding anything contained in rule 28 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945, for import of drugs for sale or distribution, if an existing valid import licence holder under the said rules, makes an application for a fresh import licence before the expiry of the existing licence, the existing import licence shall be valid until orders are passed on the application and shall be deemed to be valid for all purposes.
