CAIT demanded Investigation into unholy nexus of Banks with E commerce Companies to differentiate consumers Gross Violation of Right to Equality, FDI Policy and Competition Act. Confederation of All India Traders “Vyapar Bhawan” 925/1, Naiwala, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005, Phone: +91-11-45032664, Telefax +91-11-45032665 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cait.in Ref. No.: 3403/1/51 | Dated: 21st April,2022 Smt Nirmala Sitharaman […]
CBDT notifies SEEPZ Special Economic Zone Authority under Section 10(46) of Income Tax Act, 1961 vide Notification No. 36/2022-Income Tax, Dated: 20.04.2022. MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES) New Delhi, the 20th April, 2022 Notification No. 36/2022-Income Tax S.O. 1882(E).— In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (46) of […]
CBDT notifies Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority under Section 10(46) of Income Tax Act, 1961 vide Notification No. 35/2022-Income Tax, Dated: 20.04.2022 MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES) New Delhi, the 20th April, 2022 Notification No. 35/2022-Income Tax S.O. 1881(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (46) of section […]
Whether the first proviso to section 54(3) of UPSGST / CGST Act, prohibiting refund of unutilized ITC is applicable in case of exports of goods which are having NIL rate of export duty.
Infosys Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) The relevant ground with regard to the above issue are grounds 9.1 to 9.3. The Special Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Nagarjuna Fertilizders and Chemicals Ltd. v. ACIT reported in (2017) 78 taxmann.com 264 had held if rate of tax applicable under DTAA is lower than […]
Chinna Ponnu Ammal Trust Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai) After perusal of Form No.10B as placed on record, it could be seen that the assessee has applied an amount of Rs.5,55,57,015/- for the purpose of charitable trust. However, as per Explanation-3 to Sec.11(1), the disallowance of Rs.48,69,504/- u/s 40(a)(ia) would not be considered as application of […]
Sri Suhas Suresh Shet Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) In the matter of condonation of delay in filing appeals beyond the limitation period, the courts are empowered to condone the delay, provided the litigant is able to demonstrate that there was ‘sufficient cause’ in preferring appeal beyond the limitation period. The Courts have also held that […]
Since the major part of the work order, i.e., about 91%, is ‘Earth Work, the said work order of JV qualifies for the benefit of exemption under Sr. No. 3A of the Notification No. 12/2017-CTR dt. 08.06.2017, as amended by Notification No. 2/2018-CTR dt 25.01.2018, i.e. GST rate is NIL as Sr. no. 3 of Eleventh Schedule of Article 243G of the Constitution
As per stages of completion of work, Ai raising invoice to GMIDC, Aurangabad and on the same basis, as a JV member, applicant is raising invoice to N. Applicant, as a Ai member has got work order consisting of Earth Work such as Excavation for Tunnel, removing of excavated stuff, providing steel support, rock bolting, reinforcement, fixing of chain link, cement concerting etc. wherein total earth work is approximately 91%, construction work being around 9% wherein transfer of property is involved.
The Circular provided a mechanism of compensation to investors for delay in unblocking of application amounts by SCSBs and has prescribed certain compliance and reporting standards to be adopted by SCSBs.
