Analyze the CESTAT Kolkata order in Jai Balaji Industries Limited vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, highlighting the issue of levying Service Tax on actual transportation charges, not on provisions.
Read about Madan Kumar’s case where CESTAT Kolkata upholds the confiscation of betel nuts due to failure in providing evidence of legitimacy. Learn more about this customs dispute.
CESTAT Ahmedabad’s decision on penalty under Customs Act for fabricated DEPB scrips. Analysis of the case, rulings, and implications.
A deep dive into CESTAT Kolkata’s ruling in Commissioner of Customs Vs K.K. Woollens, where the court confirmed penalties for undetermined imports of used clothes.
CESTAT Chennai rules in favor of Renault Nissan Automotive India, stating that their refund claim can’t be rejected for not opting for Provisional Assessment.
Analyzing the S R Traders vs. Commissioner of Customs case under Customs Act Section 28, including undervaluation and compliance issues with cosmetics imports.
Delhi High Court sets aside Assessment and Penalty Orders due to AO’s oversight and insufficient response time, remanding matters for a fair hearing.
Dive into the RKM Powergen vs. Customs case. Learn how project import benefits can’t be denied if the contract registration process began before the goods’ importation.
In a recent CESTAT Mumbai order, the eligibility of cenvat credit for bus transportation charges is discussed. Learn the key details and implications here.
Dive into the legal complexities of the Commissioner of Customs Vs S K P Enterprises case (CESTAT Kolkata), which revolves around the import of restricted old and used clothing. Get insights on why CESTAT dismissed the appeal for enhanced fines.
