ITAT Pune held that information from the office of DIT (Inv.)-II is a tangible information enabling AO to form a belief that income has escaped assessment and hence proceedings of re-assessment justified.
ITAT Bangalore held that penalty under section 271F of the Income Tax Act leviable as assessee being a habitual defaulter filed income tax return for four years filed belatedly
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that benefit of notification no. 67/95-CE duly available on transfer of goods to additional premise as additional premise is an extension of factory of the appellant.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that service tax not leviable on construction service provided to Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission and Rajiv Awaas Yojana.
ITAT Delhi held that income derived from the property held under the trust is wholly for a charitable purpose and hence exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act is allowable.
ITAT Chennai held that before concluding with regard to applicability of provisions of section 195 of the Income Tax Act, all necessary and relevant documents like cost sharing agreement/ auditor’s report/ other evidences need to be examined thoroughly. Accordingly, matter set aside with direction to AO to re-examine the claim.
Madras High Court held that works contract service other than commercial nature rendered to the Government, Local Bodies, Statutory Authorities etc. is liable to service tax.
Bombay High Court held that conversion of limited enquiry of classification of goods in respect of Advance Rulings into an appellate enquiry is not permissible to be undertaken in writ jurisdiction.
Calcutta High Court held that passing of an order without allowing the assessee an opportunity of cross-examination of the concerned person is against the principle of natural justice and liable to be set aside.
ITAT Pune held that customs duty drawback relating to preceding assessment years can be written-off ‘as prior period item’.
