Whether payment to shareholders out of sale proceeds of a property belonging to the company, to end dispute amongst the shareholder can be cost of improvement for computation of capital gains?
Sandeep Kabra Vs Bureau of Immigrations (Calcutta High Court) Whether suspended directors of a company who are guarantors can be restricted from travelling outside Country by a Bank by issuing lookout circular on account of being Willful defaulter? The Calcutta High Court in this case was considering the petitioners’ Writ application for travelling abroad to […]
CCE, Aurangabad Vs Videocon Industries Ltd. (Supreme Court) Sub- Whether LCD panels are to be classified as part of television sets or audio players or independently for charging Customs duty? The Apex Court in this case was dealing with the classification of LCD Panels which were imported and were to be used as part of […]
SPS Steels Rolling Mills Limited and Ors. Vs Asansol Durgapur Development Authority and Anr. (Calcutta High Court) Learned Single Judge by the impugned order has reached to the conclusion that the transfer fee was exempted under the resolution plan sanctioned by the National Company Law Tribunal and has found that the demand of the respondent […]
Who can be said to be related person u/s 4(4)(c) of Central Excise Act, 1944 to enable authorities to discard transaction value & arrive at a valuation otherwise?
SC held that fixation of MRP must have been mandated by law and in the present case the institutional sale to paramilitary forces being exempted from such fixation under legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules,2011, the voluntary fixing of the MRP could not make the respondent eligible to get the exemption on institutional sales and thus allowed the SLP of the department.
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) under the Faceless Assessment framed under Section 144B of the Act had been issued by the National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi and communicated to all the Principal Chief Commissioners, Income Tax under the cover of a letter dated 3rd August, 2022.
The petitioner had made an application in the requisite form (Form GST REG-16) praying that his registration be cancelled with effect from 31.07.2021. The reason for seeking cancellation of the registration was disclosed as ‘Discontinuance of business/Closure of business’.
State of Karnataka Vs. Ecom Gill Coffee Trading Private Limited (Supreme Court) The dealer claiming ITC has to prove beyond doubt the actual transaction which can be proved by furnishing the name and address of the selling dealer, details of the vehicle which has delivered the goods, payment of freight charges, acknowledgement of taking delivery […]
As per Clause (vi) of Regulation 16 of the Buy-back Regulations, the buy-back through stock exchanges shall be subject to the restrictions on placement of bids, price and volume, as specified by SEBI.
