For the purpose of claiming benefit of deduction of the sum paid against the liability of tax, duty, cess, fee, etc., the year of payment is relevant and is only to be taken into account. The year in which the assessee incurred the liability to pay such tax, duty, etc., has no relevance and cannot be linked with the matter of giving benefit of deduction under Section 43B of the Act.
The Banking Laws (Amendment) Bill 2011 was introduced in order to amend the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970/1980. The said Bill has been passed by both the Houses of Parliament during its just concluded Winter Session.
Per Bench – Out of this bunch of ten appeals, there are various appeals of the assessee and the revenue for different assessment years against separate orders of Ld. CIT(A) VIII, Ahmedabad. All these appeals were heard together and are being disposed off by way of this common order for the sake of convenience.
G.S.R. No. (E) – In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (1) of Rule 3 of the Customs Tariff (Identification and Assessment of Safeguard Duty) Rules, 1997 and in supersession of notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No. 04/2010-Cust
CIRC Position after elimination of candidate at Sr.No.16 CA.Suresh Kabra SR.NO NAME OF CANDIDATE – WIRC(COUNCIL) VALUE RANK 22 Shah Dhinal Ashvinbhai-Ahmedabad 2570 1 24 Zaware Shiwaji Bhikaji-Pune 2540 2 13 Jambusaria Nihar Niranjan-Mumbai 2363 3 23 Vikamsey Nilesh Shivji-Mumbai 2242 4 19 Maheshwari Sanjeev Krishnagopal-Mumbai. 1890 5 9 Ghia Tarun Jamnadas-Mumbai 1877 6 14 […]
G.S.R. No. (E) – In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (1) of Rule 3 of the Customs Tariff (Transitional Product Specific Safeguard Duty) Rules, 2002 and in supersession of notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No. 03/2010-Customs (N.T.) issued vide G.S.R. No.22(E) dated the 11th January, 2010, the Central Government hereby appoints Sh. Bimal Beha
The petitioners, who are the respondents in this application, have filed the company petition by invoking various provisions of the Act, alleging certain acts of oppression and mismanagement against the applicants herein. The petitioners are opposing the increase of share capital and allotment of shares on the ground that they were holding 50% of the shares in the Company and their shareholding was diluted by allotment of shares and their present shareholding is 21.83%) which is under challenge. The petitioners apprehend that if the respondents are allowed to increase its capital and allot shares, their shareholding will further get diluted.
1. Henceforth appeals and stay applications are to be listed in the cause list chronologically age-wise. 2. Assistant Registrars of the concern Benches will ensure that at least 20 stay applications and 15 regular matters are listed in cause list chronologically.
When there was intensive examination in the first instance in respect of the issue, which was the basis for re-opening of assessment, it was necessary for the AO to indicate, what other material, or objective facts, constituted reasons to believe that the assessee had failed to disclose a material fact, necessitating reassessment proceedings.
Rule 20G(1) of Companies (Central Government’s) General Rules and Forms (Second Amendment), 2010 allows for filing of an application for rectification of mistakes made while filing Form No.1, Form No.lA and Form No.44 electronically, on the Ministry’s website.
