In exercise of the powers conferred under Rule 49 A of the DVAT Rules 2005, the last date for filing of Annexure 2C and Annexure 2D forming part of the return in Form DAVAT-16 pertaining to the 1st quarter ending 30.06.2013 is hereby extended as per Schedule given below:
For the purposes of this sub-regulation, for the removal of doubts, it is clarified that the acts or omissions listed in this sub-regulation are not exhaustive and that an act or omission is prohibited if it falls within the purview of regulation 3, notwithstanding that it is not included in this sub-regulation or is described as being committed only by a certain category of persons in this sub-regulation.
The assessee filed a return cf income claiming deductions under section 18(1)(b) of the Act. The deductions were disallowed. The Assessing officer, also directed initiation cf penalty proceedings, under Sections 271(1)(c) cf the Act.
Whereas, the designated authority, vide its notification No. 15/4/2011-DGAD, dated the 2nd May, 2012, published in Part I, Section I of the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, dated the 2nd May, 2012, had initiated a review in the matter of
Whereas, in the matter of Sodium Perchlorate (hereinafter referred to as the subject goods), falling under tariff item 28299010 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) (hereinafter referred to as the Customs Tariff Act),
any person resident in India may take outside India or having gone out of India on a temporary visit, may bring into India (other than to and from Nepal and Bhutan) currency notes of Government of India and Reserve Bank of India notes up to an amount not exceeding Rs.10,000 per person.
General Circular No 15/2011 dated 11th April 2011 lays down the procedure for appointment of cost auditor by companies. Clause (f) of the circular states, the company needs to e-file the application with the Central Government on www.mca.gov.in portal, in the prescribed form 23C within ninety days from the commencement of each financial year.
In continuation to the Office Order No. CCA/DC(T)/2013-98 dated 2nd August 2013, and discussions with all CAs on 06.09.2013, the following directions are being issued for strict compliance.
Merely because law does not permit demand of revaluation by candidates, it does not provide invincibility to the Council. Courts are not helpless in such matters and on being satisfied that injustice is being done, a time may come when Courts would be compelled to lift the veil of protection and direct the authorities in charge of examinations for revaluation.
CMA Navneet Kumar Jain The companies have now reason to relax as now no additional fee will be applicable for late filing of e-form 23C utpo 31st Oct 2013. Background: MCA had issued a cost audit order dated 6th Nov 2012 applicable from the year 2013-14 onward suppressing all the earlier cost audit orders. Through […]