Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : The Commissioner of Income-tax Vs Bal Kishan Dhawan HUF (Punjab And Haryana High Court at Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
The assessee filed a return cf income claiming deductions under section 18(1)(b) of the Act. The deductions were disallowed. The Assessing officer, also directed initiation cf penalty proceedings, under Sections 271(1)(c) cf the Act. The Assessing Officer’s order was affirmed up to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Assessing officer, thereafter,passed an order imposing penalty. The controversy, in the present case, is fully covered against the assessee by a judgment of the Delhi High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax versus Zoom Communication Private Limited, 2010 (327) ITR 510 (D...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930