Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : The Commissioner of Income-tax Vs Bal Kishan Dhawan HUF (Punjab And Haryana High Court at Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

The assessee filed a return cf income claiming deductions under section 18(1)(b) of the Act. The deductions were disallowed. The Assessing officer, also directed initiation cf penalty proceedings, under Sections 271(1)(c) cf the Act. The Assessing Officer’s order was affirmed up to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Assessing officer, thereafter,passed an order imposing penalty.

The controversy, in the present case, is fully covered against the assessee by a judgment of the Delhi High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax versus Zoom Communi

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31