CS Akansha Rathi Dear Professionals, Our December 2020 edition on the recent amendments/ news in the field of Corporate Laws and allied laws is below. SEBI’s newly proposed norms for listing on Innovators Growth Platform (IGP) may lead to boost in funding in startups from Institutional Investors. MCA has notified certain sections of the Companies […]
Spooner Industries P Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Addition made by the ld. AO and confirmed by the ld. CIT (Appeals) under Section 68 of the Act deserves to be deleted for the reason that ( 1) it was not part of reasons for limited scrutiny, ( 2) no enquiries made by the Assessing Officer […]
Attention of Importers/Exporters, Custom Brokers, Trade, Partner Government Agencies (PGAs) and other stakeholders is invited to CBIC Advisory No. 01/2021 dated 05.01.2021 on Single Window – Online Query Module and other functionalities for PGA working in ICES.
Due to the various ground realties the corporates have not been able to take benefit of the scheme. Therefore in these difficult times the extension of CFSS, 2020 is imperative and paying such hefty penalties & fines will not be in best interest of all stakeholders. Thus we request your good office to extend the CFSS, 2020 and other related relaxations till 31.03.2020 in the interest of all stakeholders.
Rajyalakshmi Reguraj Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) The A.O. had restricted the claim of exemption u/s 54F of the I.T.Act for the reason that the assessee had utilized only the sale consideration of Rs.1,75,83,000 out of the balance sale consideration of Rs.1,90,00,000 (Rs.2,40,00,000 – Rs.50,00,000) for the construction of a residential house. Accordingly, proportionately exemption u/s […]
Exercise of power by the Central Government under Section 11A(2) of the DDA Act, 1957 is just and proper and thus the modifications regarding change in land use of plot Nos. 2 to 8 in the Master Plan of Delhi, 2021/Zonal Development Plan for Zone-D and Zone-C vide impugned notification dated 20.3.2020 stands confirmed.
Assessee also incurred expenditure in constructing Amritsar Bus Terminal on BOT basis and to recoup said investment, assessee was allowed to collect Adda fees from users of said bus terminal. The said right was business or commercial right in terms of section 32(1)(ii) and was an intangible asset, therefore, assessee was entitled to claim depreciation.
Case No. ADD-SSR-07/2020 Sunset Review of anti-dumping investigation concerning imports of Phthalic Anhydride originating in or exported from Japan and Russia.
FNF India Private Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) The brief facts are that the AO denied deduction of gratuity paid. The assessee submitted before the CIT(Appeals) that it had created a provision for gratuity amounting to Rs.1,4769,903 and that Rs.44,22,139 was actually paid to the employees. In its return of income, the assessee had erroneously […]
DCIT Vs Ritesh Properties & Industries Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) 1. Foreign travel expense not allowable if no nexus between travel & business purpose Though the counsel submits that the action of the CIT(A) in upholding the disallowance of Rs.7,02,655/- on the ground that the said expenditure was incurred for foreign travel for personal purposes is […]
