Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Samarth Lifestyle Retailing Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Samarth Lifestyle Retailing Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Jaipur) ITAT Jaipur held that addition towards unsecured loan cannot be sustained since identity of lenders, creditworthiness of parties and genuineness of loan transaction duly proved. Accordingly, CIT(A) order upheld and appeal of revenue dismissed. Facts- AO observed that the assessee has deposited huge cash to the tune of Rs. 43,29,46,364/- into the current account. Post considering the reply from assessee, AO made addition of Rs. 24,03,02,520/- on account of cash deposit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. CIT(A) deleted the said ad...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031