Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Tansingh Vs PCIT (TAT Raipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Tansingh Vs PCIT (TAT Raipur) AO’s Mechanical Acceptance of Return Leads to Revision- Assessment Accepted Without Inquiry – Tribunal Upholds Pr.CIT’s Revision u/s 263 on Liquor Trader’s Case Assessee, engaged in liquor trading, filed a return declaring income of ₹19.10 lakh in response to notice u/s 148. AO accepted the returned income in the reassessment order u/s 147/144B without conducting any detailed verification. Later, based on an audit objection citing CIT v. Mekala Bal Reddy (AP HC), it was noted that liquor business profits should be estimated at 5% of turnover. With turnov...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930