Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

No Enduring Benefit in Routine Telecom Expenses: ₹169 Cr Customer Acquisition Cost allowed

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 9944
Case Name
Tata Teleservices Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2017-18
Advertisement

Tata Teleservices Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)

ITAT Delhi: ₹169 Cr Customer Acquisition Cost Allowed as Revenue Expenditure – No Enduring Benefit in Routine Telecom Business

Facts in Brief

Tata Teleservices Ltd. filed its return declaring a loss of ₹324.29 crore. The AO, while completing assessment u/s 143(3), disallowed Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) of ₹169.09 crore, treating it as capital expenditure incurred for creating an enduring benefit by enlarging the customer base. The expenditure included porting charges, data entry costs, & handset subsidies paid to distributors for selling handsets below cost.

CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, holding the customer base to be an intangible asset eligible for depreciation u/s 32(1)(ii), following ITAT Hyderabad’s decision in SKS Micro Finance Ltd.

Assessee’s Arguments

  • CAC was incurred in the ordinary course of business & did not create any enduring benefit.
  • The expenditure was recurring, unlike one-time acquisitions in India Capital Markets (P) Ltd. or SKS Micro Finance Ltd., where customer bases were acquired via slump sales.
  • Relied on Empire Jute Co. Ltd. (SC), SBI Cards & Payments (P) Ltd. (Del HC), & IndianVisit.com (P) Ltd. (Del HC), holding that such expenses are revenue in nature.
  • Even if capitalized, it was a loss year—so no revenue loss would result, citing Excel Industries Ltd. (SC).

Tribunal’s Findings/ Decision

  • The CAC was recurring & routine, not a one-time purchase of a customer base; therefore, precedents relied on by AO/CIT(A) were inapplicable.
  • The genuineness of expenditure was never questioned.
  • AO’s view was contradictory—he treated handset subsidies as capital but simultaneously taxed handset sales as revenue receipts.
  • Applying the principle of “enduring benefit” pragmatically (Empire Jute Co. Ltd., SBI Cards), ITAT held that the CAC provided only short-term business advantage, not acquisition of an asset or right.
  • The disallowance of ₹169.09 crore was deleted. The CAC was held to be revenue expenditure allowable u/s 37(1).

Key Takeaway

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 6,298

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.