Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO vs Samrat Madhav Paikrao (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Samrat Madhav Paikrao (ITAT Mumbai) Reassessment Notice Quashed – ITAT Mumbai Follows Vodafone Idea Ruling on Invalid Sanction Revenue filed appeal against the NFAC order dated 29.05.2025 deleting addition made in reassessment u/s 147, while the Assessee filed cross-objection challenging the very validity of notice u/s 148 for AY 2018-19. Assessee argued that the notice dated 05.04.2022 was issued beyond three years from the end of AY 2018-19 &  the approval was wrongly obtained from the PCIT, instead of the Principal Chief Commissioner (PCCIT) as mandated by Section 151(1) (prio...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Bangalore ITAT Upholds Section 11 Exemption Despite Alleged Capitation Fee Collections Bangalore ITAT Allows Mine Development Expenditure as Revenue Expense; Deletes Double Addition ITAT Allows Exemption for BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition; Cash Redeposit from Earlier Property Sale Accepted Entire Sales Receipts Cannot Be Taxed Under Section 69A: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930