Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sunil Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sunil Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) Notice Missing ‘Limited or Complete Scrutiny’ Label? Entire Assessment Becomes Void Invalid 143(2) Notice = No   This appeal deals with a crucial jurisdictional defect that strikes at the very root of the assessment – the validity of the notice issued under Section 143(2).  Assessee’s appeal reached the ITAT with a delay of 288 days, but the delay was supported by an affidavit explaining genuine reasons, &  even the Department did not object. Tribunal, guided by the principle that matters must be decided on merit rather than technicality, condon...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Mass Relief on 234E Fees: ITAT Deletes Levy for Pre-01.06.2015 Period DVO Valuation Without Notice Invalid: Matter Remanded for Fresh Determination Section 56(2)(x): Stamp Value on Booking Date to Apply – ITAT Deletes Addition Past Savings Accepted: Small Cash Introduction Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Reassessment for AY 2015-16 Time-Barred – ITAT Quashes Entire Penny Stock Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930