Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Estimated Profit Penalty Deleted: Reason Why 271(1)(c) Cannot Apply to Estimated Income Additions

Case Law Details

Case Name
Samir N. Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2012-13
Advertisement
Samir N. Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Only Estimate, No Evidence: ITAT Strikes Down 271(1)(c)- When income is enhanced only by applying an estimated profit rate ,without concrete evidence of concealment, 271(1)(c) penalty is not leviable This appeal concerned the validity of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) when the underlying addition was made purely on estimated profit on alleged bogus purchases. Assessee, an individual, filed his return declaring income of ₹23.39 lakh. Based on information from the Investigation Wing that he was a beneficiary of accommodation entries from the Bhanwarlal Jain group, AO ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *