Case Law Details
Case Name : Samir N. Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Samir N. Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Only Estimate, No Evidence: ITAT Strikes Down 271(1)(c)- When income is enhanced only by applying an estimated profit rate ,without concrete evidence of concealment, 271(1)(c) penalty is not leviable
This appeal concerned the validity of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) when the underlying addition was made purely on estimated profit on alleged bogus purchases.
Assessee, an individual, filed his return declaring income of ₹23.39 lakh. Based on information from the Investigation Wing that he was a beneficiary of accommodation entries from the Bhanwarlal Jain group, AO ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


