This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Estimated Profit Penalty Deleted: Reason Why 271(1)(c) Cannot Apply to Estimated Income Additions
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Samir N. Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2012-13
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Samir N. Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Only Estimate, No Evidence: ITAT Strikes Down 271(1)(c)- When income is enhanced only by applying an estimated profit rate ,without concrete evidence of concealment, 271(1)(c) penalty is not leviable
This appeal concerned the validity of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) when the underlying addition was made purely on estimated profit on alleged bogus purchases.
Assessee, an individual, filed his return declaring income of ₹23.39 lakh. Based on information from the Investigation Wing that he was a beneficiary of accommodation entries from the Bhanwarlal Jain group, AO ...






