Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jyoti Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jyoti Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Expression ‘residential house’ used in section 54F denotes one residential house & different floors of the one residential house cannot be considered as separate residential houses Assessee, Jyoti Jain, owned an industrial plot which she sold through four registered sale deeds for a total consideration of Rs.2.62 crore. Out of the resultant capital gains, she invested Rs.2.10 crore in acquiring the remaining one-half shares in the first & second floors of a residential property at Delhi. The property had earlier been partly purchased in 2011 with her...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930