Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bhupesh Sevantilal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bhupesh Sevantilal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) No Penalty on Estimated Additions – ITAT Mumbai Rules in Bogus Purchase Case- Estimated Profit Element Cannot Lead to Penalty – Revenue’s Case Fails- No Cogent Evidence, Only Estimates – Tribunal Protects Assessee from Penalty Assessee had filed return declaring income of Rs. 75.04 lakh which was assessed at Rs. 81.62 lakh after making addition of Rs. 5.29 lakh, being 12.5% of purchases treated as bogus from Shree Ram Steel. In appeal, CIT(A) reduced the disallowance to 7.5%, thereby sustaining addition of Rs. 3.17 lakh.  AO thereafter levi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930