Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bhupesh Sevantilal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bhupesh Sevantilal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) No Penalty on Estimated Additions – ITAT Mumbai Rules in Bogus Purchase Case- Estimated Profit Element Cannot Lead to Penalty – Revenue’s Case Fails- No Cogent Evidence, Only Estimates – Tribunal Protects Assessee from Penalty Assessee had filed return declaring income of Rs. 75.04 lakh which was assessed at Rs. 81.62 lakh after making addition of Rs. 5.29 lakh, being 12.5% of purchases treated as bogus from Shree Ram Steel. In appeal, CIT(A) reduced the disallowance to 7.5%, thereby sustaining addition of Rs. 3.17 lakh.  AO thereafter levi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Benami Veil Cannot Be Lifted by Clever Drafting: SC Restores Rejection of Plaint at Threshold Specific Performance Decree Does Not Die Automatically: SC Revives Execution Despite Delay in Deposit IBC Is Not a Recovery Shortcut: SC Rejects CIRP in Builder-Bank-Borrower Dispute No Signature, Yet Bound by Arbitration: SC Allows Collaborator to Invoke Arbitration Clause Entire Bank Deposits Cannot Be Taxed as Income – ITAT Restricts Addition to 2% in Renukamata Society Cases View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031