This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Addition u/s. 69A not sustained as bank account belongs to HUF of assessee
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ITO Vs A. Kulanthaivel (ITAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2018-19
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
ITO Vs A. Kulanthaivel (ITAT Chennai)
ITAT Chennai held that addition under section 69A of the Income Tax Act towards cash deposits not reflected in bank account details cannot be sustained since the income doesn’t belong to assessee in the individual status but the income belong to HUF of the assessee.
Facts- The AO received information that the assessee has made cash deposit of Rs.4,66,49,320/- in the bank account, however, the same was not reflected in bank account details. Hence, AO added the same u/s 69A of the Income Tax Act. CIT(A) considered the submissions and deleted the addition....




