Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT Raipur Sets Aside Penalty for Lack of Adequate Hearing

Case Law Details

Case Name
Omax Minerals Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Raipur)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2015-16
Advertisement
Omax Minerals Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Raipur) Principle of Natural Justice Reinforced: Appeal Restored for Fresh Consideration Assessee faced a survey u/s 133A at its business premises, followed by a search u/s 132 at related group concerns. Consequently, a notice u/s 153C was issued. Assessee treated its original return u/s 139 as filed u/s 153C. On scrutiny, AO made an addition of ₹4,37,260 as unaccounted expenditure, resulting in assessed income of ₹2.87 crore. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) were initiated for concealment/inaccurate particulars. Since the assessee did not respond to no...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,510

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *