Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bhanwarlal Champalal Kanunga Vs PCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bhanwarlal Champalal Kanunga Vs PCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) AO Already Examined Agricultural Income, PCIT Cannot Substitute His Opinion- 263 Quashed; PCIT Cannot Rely on Past Year to Revise Current Assessment – 263 Set Aside by Ahmedabad Bench Ahmedabad  Tribunal in quashed revisionary order u/s 263 by holding that AO had made due enquiries into agricultural income claim & accepted Assessee’s explanation, hence PCIT could not revise the order merely for taking a different view. Assessee, an individual, filed return declaring total income of Rs.63.44 lakh & exempt agricultural income of...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930