Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kalasadhanalaya Vs CIT (Exemptions) (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2025-26
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kalasadhanalaya Vs CIT (Exemptions) (ITAT Chennai) Assessee trust, registered u/s 12A & holding provisional 80G approval, filed a fresh application in Form 10AB seeking continuation of 80G benefits. CIT(E) rejected the application on 30.09.2024, observing that the primary object of the trust was to promote awareness of traditional dance forms like Bharatanatyam & Kuchipudi, which could not be construed as “charitable purpose” u/s 2(15). According to  CIT(E), imparting training in dance is not education but promotion of cultural recreation, thereby falling outside the scope of char...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930