Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Tvl. Slitina Metal Sales LLP Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST)(FAC) (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : W. P.No.17112 of 2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/07/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Tvl. Slitina Metal Sales LLP Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST)(FAC) (Madras High Court)

Madras High Court held that tax confirmed on premise of non-furnishing of required documents, however, none of the documents were called for in the show cause notice. Accordingly, order set aside and matter remanded.

Facts-

The petitioner received show cause notice dated 28.12.2023 in respect of two issues. The first issue dealt with therein was the claim of Input Tax Credit in respect of allegedly ineligible commodities as per sub-section (5) of Section 17 of applicable GST statutes. The second issue was the claim of ITC for supplies from cancelled dealers, who had not remitted tax dues. The petitioner replied to such show cause notice on 12.01.2024. Along with such reply, the petitioner attached the invoice and e-way bills relating to the supplies from M/s.VK Impex. The petitioner also enclosed proof of filing of returns by the said supplier. As regards the first issue, it was stated that MS Scrap was purchased from three suppliers in furtherance of business.

Conclusion-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031