Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Unless escaped income exceeds ₹50 lakhs no action beyond 3 years could take place

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2024 taxguru.in 3406
Case Name
Lakshmi Multipurpose Co-operative Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2016-17
Advertisement

Lakshmi Multipurpose Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)

The case of Lakshmi Multipurpose Co-operative Society vs ITO before ITAT Bangalore revolves around the jurisdictional limits of income under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for reassessment. The dispute arose when the AO issued a notice based on deposited amounts, challenging the society’s eligibility under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).

The society contested the AO’s jurisdiction under Section 148, arguing that the income in question (Rs. 48,53,282/-) fell below the Rs. 50 lakh threshold specified in Section 149(1)(b). Citing precedents like Sanath Kumar Murali vs ITO and Pramila Mahadev Tadkase vs ITO from the Karnataka High Court, it argued that no notice should have been issued beyond three years from the end of the assessment year, unless the income exceeded Rs. 50 lakhs.

ITAT Bangalore examined these arguments and upheld the society’s contention. It referenced the High Court’s rulings, emphasizing that unless the escaped income surpasses Rs. 50 lakhs, jurisdictional actions under Section 148 cannot extend beyond three years from the relevant assessment year. Therefore, the ITAT concluded that the AO erred in assuming jurisdiction, leading to the quashing of the proceedings against the society.

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT BANGALORE

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.