Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Geep Industries (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors Vs Competition Commission of India (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P.(C) 10332/2023
Date of Judgement/Order : 26/04/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Geep Industries (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors Vs Competition Commission of India (Delhi High Court)

Geep Industries (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors v. Competition Commission of India (CCI) involves a challenge to an order passed by the CCI on July 18, 2023, directing the petitioners to deposit interest on a penalty amount for a specific period. The petitioners argue that the CCI lacked the authority to demand interest without following the prescribed procedure outlined in the Competition Commission of India (Manner of Recovery of Monetary Penalty) Regulations, 2011 (2011 Regulations).

The case arose from proceedings initiated against Geep Industries and its directors under the Competition Act, 2002. The CCI’s order of August 30, 2018, directed the petitioners to cease cartelization activities in the dry cell batteries market and imposed penalties. The penalties were challenged before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), which partially upheld the penalties. During the appeal’s pendency, the CCI’s order was stayed subject to Geep Industries depositing 10% of the penalty amount.

Following the NCLAT’s order on March 31, 2023, reducing Geep Industries’ penalty, the CCI issued demand notices for the penalty amount and directed the petitioners to pay simple interest of 1.5% per month from December 10, 2018, till the date of payment. The petitioners contested this, arguing that the CCI could only levy interest according to the 2011 Regulations.

The petitioners’ principal contention was that interest could only be imposed following the procedure outlined in the 2011 Regulations. They highlighted Regulation 3, which mandates the issuance of a demand notice before levying interest. They argued that the CCI’s demand notice, as per Form-I of the 2011 Regulations, should precede any imposition of interest.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031