Case Law Details
In re Abans Alternative Fund Manager LLP (GST AAR Gujarat)
Introduction: The case of Abans Alternative Fund Manager LLP before the GST Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) in Gujarat delves into the tax liability of a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) unit for legal services procured from advocates. Specifically, the applicant sought clarity on whether they are required to pay taxes under the reverse charge mechanism (RCM) as per Notification No. 10/2017-Integrated Tax Rate.
Detailed Analysis: The applicant, being an SEZ unit engaged in managing schemes under the Category-III Alternative Investment Fund (AIF), highlighted various legal provisions and notifications governing their tax obligations. They argued that as an SEZ unit, they benefit from exemptions and concessions under the SEZ Act, 2005, and related notifications.
The crux of their argument rested on the interpretation of provisions such as Section 16 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (IGST Act), which defines zero-rated supplies, and Notification No. 10/2017-Integrated Tax Rate, which specifies services subject to RCM. Additionally, they invoked Rule 5(5)(a) of the SEZ Rules, 2006, and other notifications exempting SEZ units from certain tax obligations.
The AAR’s analysis involved a thorough examination of relevant legal provisions, notifications, and precedents. They assessed the applicant’s contentions in light of statutory interpretations and clarifications provided by tax authorities. Key considerations included the applicability of RCM, the nature of supplies to SEZ units, and the impact of SEZ legislation on GST liabilities.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
