Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anil Kumar Paik Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Anil Kumar Paik Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) Conclusion: Advances received against booking of flats were not an unexplained investment under section 69 as there was no mechanism under the Act to make the addition for the excess of fair market value over the purchase consideration paid for purchase of immovable property before 01/04/2017 and assessee had duly disclosed the transactions as consideration had been paid through banking channel thus, no addition to be made. Held: Assessee-individual was carrying out various types of business including property development, liquor shop, medicine shop and r...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930