Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anil Kumar Paik Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Anil Kumar Paik Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)

Conclusion: Advances received against booking of flats were not an unexplained investment under section 69 as there was no mechanism under the Act to make the addition for the excess of fair market value over the purchase consideration paid for purchase of immovable property before 01/04/2017 and assessee had duly disclosed the transactions as consideration had been paid through banking channel thus, no addition to be made.

He

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31