Case Law Details
Case Name : Anil Kumar Paik Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Kolkata
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Anil Kumar Paik Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Conclusion: Advances received against booking of flats were not an unexplained investment under section 69 as there was no mechanism under the Act to make the addition for the excess of fair market value over the purchase consideration paid for purchase of immovable property before 01/04/2017 and assessee had duly disclosed the transactions as consideration had been paid through banking channel thus, no addition to be made.
He Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.