AI cannot be the basis of adjudication of legal or factual issues in a court of law

Christian Louboutin SAS & Anr Vs Shoe Boutique (Delhi High Court) Conclusion: In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble High court observed that ChatGPT cannot be the basis of adjudication of legal or factual issues in a court of law. AI cannot substitute either the human intelligence or the humane element in the adjudicatory process. At best the tool could be utilised for a preliminary understanding or for preliminary research and nothing more. Facts: The present suit was filed by Plaintiffs which are entities existing in France. The first shop of the Plaintiffs is stated to have opened...