This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
AI cannot be the basis of adjudication of legal or factual issues in a court of law
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Christian Louboutin SAS & Anr Vs Shoe Boutique (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Christian Louboutin SAS & Anr Vs Shoe Boutique (Delhi High Court)
Conclusion: In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble High court observed that ChatGPT cannot be the basis of adjudication of legal or factual issues in a court of law. AI cannot substitute either the human intelligence or the humane element in the adjudicatory process. At best the tool could be utilised for a preliminary understanding or for preliminary research and nothing more.
Facts: The present suit was filed by Plaintiffs which are entities existing in France. The first shop of the Plaintiffs is stat...
Author Info
