AI cannot be the basis of adjudication of legal or factual issues in a court of law

Christian Louboutin SAS & Anr Vs Shoe Boutique (Delhi High Court)

Conclusion: In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble High court observed that ChatGPT cannot be the basis of adjudication of legal or factual issues in a court of law. AI cannot substitute either the human intelligence or the humane element in the adjudicatory process. At best the tool could be utilised for a preliminary understanding or for preliminary research and nothing more.

Fac

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.