This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 36(1)(viia) Deduction for Bad & Doubtful Debts Allowed Regardless of Rural & Non-Rural Advances
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- DCIT Vs Yes Bank Ltd (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2014-15
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
DCIT Vs Yes Bank Ltd (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT Mumbai held that deduction u/s 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act towards Provision for bad and doubtful debts allowable irrespective of rural advance and non-rural advances.
Facts- The return of income filed by the assessee was selected for scrutiny assessment and statutory notices under the Income-tax Act, 1961 were issued and complied with. The assessment u/s 143(3) of the Act was completed on 30.03.2016, assessing total income at Rs.2,710,009,76,971/-. On further appeal, the Ld. CIT(A) allowed part relief. Aggrieved, both the assessee and Revenue are ...





