Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Customs Vs Global Vectra Helicorp Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : CUSAA 35/2023
Date of Judgement/Order : 06/04/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Commissioner of Customs Vs Global Vectra Helicorp Ltd. (Delhi High Court)

Delhi High Court held that as per explanation inserted to Condition No. 104, exemption condition would be satisfied if the aircraft imported is used for non-scheduled (passenger) services or non-scheduled (charter) services. Accordingly, use of imported aircraft by non-scheduled (passenger) services, shall not be construed to be a violation of conditions of imports at concessional rate of duty.

Facts- The Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) had issued a show cause notice dated 06.08.2008 in respect of three helicopters, which were imported by the respondent by availing the benefit of the Exemption Notification. It was, inter alia, alleged in the said show cause notice that the helicopters were imported for ‘non-scheduled air transport (passenger) service’; however, the said helicopters were not used for the said purpose. It was alleged that the respondent has not complied with the Civil Aviation Requirement, Section 3, Air Transport Service ‘C’, Part 3 dated 08.10.1999, which requires the non-scheduled operators to issue passenger tickets in accordance with the provisions of Carriage by Air Act, 1972. It was further alleged that the respondent had charged fixed monthly charges for the period August, 2007 to January, 2008 from M/s Vectra Aviation Pvt. Ltd. – a group company of the respondent – therefore the helicopters were not used for non-scheduled (passenger) services. It was alleged that this was in violation of the Condition No.104 of the Exemption Notification and thus the respondent was liable to pay duty.

In respect of another helicopter, it was, inter alia, alleged that the same was given on a long-term lease contract to M/s Dhillon Aviation Pvt. Ltd. and the same was in violation of the Exemption Notification as the permit obtained by the respondent was for non-scheduled (passenger) services.

In view of the allegations contained in the show cause notice, the respondent was called upon to show cause as to (a) why the helicopters should not be confiscated under Section III(d) and 111(o) of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereafter the ‘Customs Act’); (b) penalty under Sections 112 and 114A of the Customs Act not be imposed; (c) and an amount of ₹23,79,24,458/- along with interest be not recovered as customs duty in respect of the three aircrafts.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031