Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pramod Pareek Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-2009
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pramod Pareek Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) Conclusion: Where income was offered on presumptive basis under section 44AD, there was no need to maintain books of accounts therefore addition made against the vegetable vendor was deleted for failure to substantiate the unexplained cash deposit. Held: During the course of assessment proceedings, AO found that assessee had made cash sales of Rs.17,76,160/- against cash purchase of Rs. 1,90,500/- only. He submitted that he was not required to maintain any books of accounts as income was declared u/s 44AD for which assessee furnished copies of P&L account...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031