Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Huhtamaki India Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Huhtamaki India Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad) CESTAT Ahmedabad held that deposit in PLA is not a payment of duty. Accordingly, refund claim for unutilized balance in PLA is not hit by limitation of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Facts- The issue involved in the present case is that whether the appellant’s refund of unutilized PLA balance is hit by limitation provided under Section 11B when the refund was claimed after one year from the date of deposit. Conclusion- Held that the deposit in PLA is not a payment of duty whereas it is an adva...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930