Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Muppavarapu Kavitha Vs ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Muppavarapu Kavitha Vs ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam) It was contended that mother of the assessee is staying with her daughter, who is the only daughter and hence the benefit of CBDT Instruction No. 1916 should also be extended to the mother of the assessee. Admitted facts are that the gold jewellery belonging to family members was seized to the extent of 1628.025 grams and there is no dispute on the fact that as per the CBDT Instruction No.1916, dated 11/5/1994 that in a case of a person who is not assessed to wealth tax, gold jewellery and ornaments to the extent of 500 grams per a married lady,...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930