Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hindustan Steel and Cement Vs Assistant State Tax Officer & Ors  (Kerala High Court)
Appeal Number : WP(C) No. 17454 of 2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 18/07/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Hindustan Steel and Cement Vs Assistant State Tax Officer & Ors  (Kerala High Court)

The Hon’ble High Court of Kerala in Hindustan Steel and Cement Vs. Assistant State Tax Officer & Ors (W.P.C. No. 17454 of 2022 dated: 18.07.2022) held that even in cases where tax or penalty levied U/s. 129 of the GST Acts,2017 was paid by a taxable person he can file an appeal U/s. 107 of the said Acts. Here the provision contained under sub –section (5) of Section 129 that “ On payment of amount referred in sub-section (1), all proceedings in respect of the notice specified in sub –section (3) shall be deemed to be concluded” does not mean that the affected assessee/taxable person has no statutory right to file an appeal under the Acts, if payment is made.

FACTS OF THE CASE

The goods/conveyance of the petitioners were the subject matter of detention/seizure U/s.129 of the CGST/SGST Acts and the petitioners in these cases opted to pay amounts in terms of the pre amended provisions of Section 129(1)(a) of the CGST/SGST Acts, to get the goods/conveyance released pending finalisation of proceedings. On payment of the amount, the goods and the conveyance were released as contemplated by sub-section (1) by issuing Form MOV-05. While an order was issued in Form MOV-09 (issued under sub-section (3) of Section 129), a corresponding summary of order/demand in form MOV-07 was not issued. As a result, the petitioners are not in a position to approach the appellate authority by filing an appeal U/s. 107 of the CGST/SGST Acts. On the reading of sub-section (3) of Section 129 CGST/SGST Acts with Rule 142 (5) of the CGST/SGST Rules and the provisions of Circular No.41/15/2018-GST dated: 13.04.2018, the order under sub-section (3) of Section 129 issued in Form MOV- 09 should have been accompanied by a summary of the order in Form MOV-07. Without a summary of the order in Form MOV-07, the petitioners are disabled from filing an appeal as the system accepts an appeal only if there is a summary of an order issued in Form MOV-07.

HELD BY THE COURT

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

I am Aji V. Dev, a practising lawyer in the High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam. I hail from Vallicodu- Kottayam a beautiful village near to Pathanamthitta in the Kerala state of India, where undulating hills decorated by tall trees and lush green vegetation descends to the paddy fields in a rhythmic wa View Full Profile

My Published Posts

GST on Old Age Homes & Senior Citizen Services Kerala VAT Act – SC declares rate of tax of Mosquito Mats @ 12.5% & Dettol @ 4% Income Tax Return Filed by A Co-op Society after due Date is invalid – 80P Deduction not allowed: Kerala HC, Transfer/ Sale of One of Independent Running Business Divisions Is Exempt from Levy of GST Lok Ayukta cannot override orders Passed by Tax Authorities: Kerala HC View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031