Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Auriga Research Private Limited (GST AAR Karnataka)
Appeal Number : Advance Ruling No. KAR ADRG 15/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/05/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Auriga Research Private Limited (GST AAR Karnataka)

Section 95 (c) of the CGST Act 2017 defines ‘Applicant’ as any person registered or desirous of obtaining registration under the said Act.

It could be easily inferred from above that any person registered or desirous of obtaining registration under CGST Act 2017 can seek advance ruling only in relation to the supply of goods or services or both being undertaken or proposed to be undertaken.

In the instant case, we observe that Auriga Research Private Limited, who have filed the application, is not a supplier. Thus the instant application is not admissible and liable for rejection in terms of Section 98(2) of the CGST Act 2017.

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, KARNATAKA

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031