This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Provisional attachment should not hamper normal business activities of taxable person
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Arya Metacast Pvt. Ltd. Vs State Of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Gujarat High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Arya Metacast Pvt. Ltd. Vs State Of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court)
In the facts of the case, undisputedly, the respondent no.2 has not only provisionally attached the stock of goods lying at the factory premise of the writ applicants, at the same time, the respondent No.2 has also provisionally attached the demat account and current account of the writ applicants. These are the valuable assets of the writ applicants, more particularly, raw material and the finished goods are valuables which are otherwise necessary for running of the business of the applicants. Even operating the demat account an...






