Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : State of Orissa Vs Utkal Distilleries Ltd (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal Nos. 5666­-5668 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 03/03/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

State of Orissa Vs Utkal Distilleries Ltd (Supreme Court)

Constitution makers distributed the term ‘alcohol liquor’ into two heads, viz., (a) for human consumption; and (b) other than for human consumption. It has been held that the alcoholic liquors, which are for human consumption, are put in Entry 51 List II authorizing the State Legislature to levy tax on them, whereas alcoholic liquors other than for human consumption have been left to the Central Legislature under Entry 84 for levy of duty of excise. It has been held that what has been excluded in Entry 84 has specifically been put within the authority of the State for purposes of taxation. The Constitution Bench clearly held that the State Legislature had no authority to levy duty or tax on alcohol, which is not for human consumption as that could be levied only by the Centre.

A three Judge Bench of this Court in the case of State of U.P. and others vs. Modi Distillery and others2 was considering the power of the State Government to levy excise duty on wastage of liquor after distillation. Following the judgment of the Constitution Bench of this Court in the case of Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. (supra), this Court observed thus:

“10. What the State seeks to levy excise duty upon in the Group ‘B’ cases is the wastage of liquor after distillation, but be­fore dilution; and, in the Group ‘D’ cases, the pipeline loss of liquor during the process of manufacture, before dilution. It is clear, therefore, that what the State seeks to levy excise duty upon is not alco­holic liquor for human consumption but the raw material or input still in process of being rendered fit for consumption by human beings. The State is not empow­ered to levy excise duty on the raw mate­rial or input that is in the process of be­ing made into alcoholic liquor for human consumption.”

 It could thus be seen that this Court held that the State was only empowered to levy excise duty on alcoholic liquor for human consumption. This Court held that the State has no power to levy excise duty on wastage of liquor after distillation.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031