Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Amrutlal V. Rukhana Vs Rao Ranvijay Singh, CIT (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition No. 3388 of 2004
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/12/2021
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Amrutlal V. Rukhana Vs Rao Ranvijay Singh, CIT (Bombay High Court)

Since nobody is appearing for respondent in many matters we are unable to get any assistance from the Revenue. This is only one such matter. This is notwithstanding, this court informing the CIT (Judicial) who was present in the court on two or three occasions on directions of this court about problems which the court faces in hearing and disposing the matters because of total lack of assistance from the Revenue. Cause lists are prepared and released in advance and it was the bounden duty and responsibility of Revenue to ensure that in all matters lawyers were present and Revenue was represented. We have to observe that this casual and don’t care approach on the part of Revenue has been going on for a long time. It is a colossal waste to the nation as public money is involved in all these matters pertaining to the tax department. There are three officers always present in the court who are also of no assistance to this court and we are also not aware who is the lawyer supposed to represent Revenue in each of these matters. No vakalatnama also is filed in the old matters though counsel has appeared for Revenue at the admissions stage.

2. Earlier also a similar order was passed in Income Tax Appeal No. 1916 of 2017 dated 15th November, 2021.

11. We have to note that this is one more appeal filed in a ritualistic manner which has unnecessarily taken up the scarce time of this court. The Commissioner of Income Tax and CIT(Judicial) would do well to review all appeals filed and withdraw the same, in case the only challenge therein is to finding of facts and there is no evidence of perversity or in the fact of settled legal position. The Counsel of Revenue is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Law Secretary (Government of India), Central Board of Direct Taxes, Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (Maharashtra) and CIT (Judicial) for necessary action.

Paragraph No.19 in another matter, Ananta Landmark (P) Ltd. vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 5 (3), Mumbai 1 reads as under :

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

Mr.Kapil Goel B.Com(H) FCA LLB, Advocate Delhi High Court advocatekapilgoel@gmail.com, 9910272804 Mr Goel is a bachelor of commerce from Delhi University (2003) and is a Law Graduate from Merrut University (2006) and Fellow member of ICAI (Nov 2004). At present, he is practicing as an Advocate View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 148 Notice Invalid; Should Have Followed Faceless Regime: Section 151A Notes of account do form part of Balance Sheet: Supreme Court Bombay HC Quashes AY 2013-14 Notices Post 31-03-2021, Rules TOLA Not Applicable PCIT Central not competent authority u/s 12AB(1) to pass order on registration of Trust No Denial of Concessional Tax Rate Due to Technical Glitch on ITBA portal View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031