Sponsored
    Follow Us:
Sponsored

Circular No. 338/54/97-Central Excise

dated 3/10/97

F.No. 387/90/96-JC
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue, New Delhi

Subject: Import of “Acrylamide” for use in the manufacture of leather goods i.e. shoe uppers, leather bags etc., meant for export-levy of Customs Duty- Clarification Reg.

I am directed to say that some of the importers imported “Acrylamide” and claimed duty free clearance under Notification No. 203/92-Cus as “Synthetic Adhesive” for use in the manufacture of leather goods i.e., shoe upper, leather articles, bags etc. In one of the cases, that Asstt. Commrs. of Customs as rejected the claims of the importers for duty free clearance of “Acrylamide” but subsequently the importers have managed to get favourable order at the level of Commr. of Customs (Appeals) reportedly by misrepresenting the facts.

The Department has agitated the matter before CEGAT but the CEGAT has dismissed the Department”s Appeal on the ground of delay in filing the Appeal. The Department has finally filed a Civil appeal before the Hon”ble supreme Court of India.

The Central Intelligence Unit of the Mumbai Custom House based on an intelligence had made investigation into the duty free clearance of “Acrylamide” as “Synthetic Adhesive” in DEEC against leather goods advance licences. The Central Intelligence Units has reported that the importers of “Acrylamide” has wrongly availed of Customs Duty exemption by not only misrepresenting the facts but also on the basis of manipulated/ fabricated documents. The opinion of Central Leather Institute of Madras had been obtained which goes to show clearly that “Acrylamide” is neither a “Synthetic Adhesive” nor is used as “Adhesive” in the manufacture of leather goods.

The matter has been examined by the Board, on the merits of the case, the Department has preferred an appeal before the Hon”ble Supreme Court in this case. In the meanwhile, it is clarified that “Acrylamide” is not entitled to the benefit of Customs Duty exemption under Notification No. 203/92-Cus as claimed by the importers.

Sd/-
(A.K. Roy)
Deputy Secretary (R)

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031