Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ravindranatha Bajpe Vs Mangalore Special Economic Zone Ltd. & Others Etc. (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Criminal Appeal No. 1047-1048/2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 27/09/2021
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Ravindranatha Bajpe Vs Mangalore Special Economic Zone Ltd. & Others Etc. (Supreme Court)

Learned Magistrate has to record his satisfaction about a prima facie case against the accused who are Managing Director, the Company Secretary and the Directors of the Company and the role played by them in their respective capacities which is sine qua non for initiating criminal proceedings against them. Looking to the averments and the allegations in the complaint, there are no specific allegations and/or averments with respect to role played by them in their capacity as Chairman, Managing Director, Executive Director, Deputy General Manager and Planner & Executor. Merely because they are Chairman, Managing Director/Executive Director and/or Deputy General Manager and/or Planner/Supervisor of A1 & A6 (Accused Companies), without any specific role attributed and the role played by them in their capacity, they cannot be arrayed as an accused, more particularly they cannot be held vicariously liable for the offences committed by A1 & A6.

FULL TEXT OF THE SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT/ORDER

Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 28.09.2015 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru in Criminal Petition No. 3989/2014 and Criminal Petition No. 3990/2014, by which the High Court has dismissed the said revision petitions and has confirmed the judgment and order passed by the learned Sessions Court, by which the learned Sessions Court set aside the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Mangalore dated 24.09.2013 issuing summons against original accused nos. 1 to 8 – respondents herein, the original complainant has preferred the present appeals.

2. The facts leading to the present appeals in nutshell are as under:

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031