Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s Aash Trading Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 4797/DEL/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/11/2020
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

M/s Aash Trading Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)

We find that AO in the reasons recorded has mentioned that Rs. 75 lacs on account of accommodation entry has been escaped, however, he had issued noticed u/s. 148 of the Act to the assesee. In response to the same, assessee filed the objection which was decided in a summary manner. We further find that after considering the reply filed by the assessee as well as documentary evidences, the AO has made the addition of Rs. 15 lacs u/s. 68 of the Act whereas AO has issued the notice u/s. 148 of the Act for escapement of income of Rs. 75 lacs which is contrary in law and shows the non-application of mind on the part of the assessee. Hence, on this account, the assessment in dispute framed by the AO is bad in law and deserve to be quashed. We further find that exactly under the similar facts and circumstances there are various cases, as relied by the ld. Counsel for the assessee, in which similar issue has been adjudicated and decided in favour of the assesee wherein the assessment has been quashed, especially the recent ITAT, Delhi SMC-I Bench decision dated 10.09.2020, passed in the case of Smt. Meena Gupta passed in ITA No. 7372/Del/2012 (AY 2011-12).

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT DELHI

This appeal filed by the Assessee is directed against the impugned order dated 30.04.2019 passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-1, New Delhi in relation to assessment year 2011-12.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed its return of income declaring NIL income on 30.3.2012. The case of the assessee was reopened u/s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called as “Act”) by issuing notice u/s. 148 of the Act on 31.3.2018 with the prior approval of the competent authority. The assessment in this case was completed under section 148 of the Act on 17.12.2018 at Rs. 15,00,000/-. In the assessment order AO made addition u/s. 68 of the Act amounting to Rs. 15,00,000/-. Against the assessment order, assessee appealed before the Ld. CIT(A) who vide his impugned order 30.4.2019 has dismissed the appeal of the assessee. Aggrieved with the impugned order dated 30.4.2019, assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

Mr.Kapil Goel B.Com(H) FCA LLB, Advocate Delhi High Court advocatekapilgoel@gmail.com, 9910272804 Mr Goel is a bachelor of commerce from Delhi University (2003) and is a Law Graduate from Merrut University (2006) and Fellow member of ICAI (Nov 2004). At present, he is practicing as an Advocate View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 148 Notice Invalid; Should Have Followed Faceless Regime: Section 151A Notes of account do form part of Balance Sheet: Supreme Court Bombay HC Quashes AY 2013-14 Notices Post 31-03-2021, Rules TOLA Not Applicable PCIT Central not competent authority u/s 12AB(1) to pass order on registration of Trust No Denial of Concessional Tax Rate Due to Technical Glitch on ITBA portal View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031