Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd. (GST AAAR Odisha)
Appeal Number : Order No. 01/0DISHA-AAAR/Appeal/2020-21
Date of Judgement/Order : 29/09/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd. (GST AAAR Odisha)

We notice that the Authority for Advance Ruling, Odisha, in their findings (para 5.3 of the Order) has clearly observed that Odisha Knowledge Corporation Limited (OKCL) was promoted by the Higher Technical Education Department, Govt of Odisha and was incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, as a Public Sector Undertaking to create new paradigm in education and development through universalisation and integration of Information Technology in teaching, learning and educational management processes in particular and socio-economic transformative processes in general. OKCL can sue and be sued in its own name and capacity distinct from its owners. The Government, being the Union or State Government, on other hand, can also sue and be sued, but in the name of Union of India or the Government of a State as empowered under the Article 300 of the Constitution of India. Article 300 of the Constitution of India is applicable to Government and does not apply to OKCL. OKCL being a registered entity under the Companies Act 1956 can execute all contracts in its own name and capacity. The Union or State Government , can also execute contracts made in the exercise of the executive power of the Union or of a State, and shall be expressed to be made by the President, or by the Governor of the State under Article 299 of the Constitution of India. Article 299 of the Constitution of India does not apply to OKCL. Article 300 of the Constitution of India provides that State can sue or be sued as juristic personality in the name of Union of India and Government of a State. Therefore, OKCL is neither the State Government nor a part of the State Government of Odisha or the Central Government and therefore the supplies by the Appellant to OKCL should not be held to be a supply to Government.

FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF APPELLATE AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, ODDISHA

1. BRIEFS FACTS OF THE CASE

1.1. M/s Telecommunication Consultants India Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Applicant” or ” the Appellant”) assigned with GSTIN 21AAACT0061H1Z0 having registered address at TCIL Bhawan, Greater Kailash-I, New Delhi-110048, had filed an application on 21.08.2018 under Section 97(1) of CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules 2017 & OGST Rules, 2017 in Form GST ARA-01 before the Authority for Advance Ruling, Odisha (herein after referred to as “AAR”) seeking an Advance Ruling on the applicability of Entry No. 72 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28.06.2017, read with Entry No. 72 of Notification bearing SRO No. 306/2017-Finance Department, Government of Odisha to the services provided by them under the category of Information and Communication Technology)1CT @ School Project.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031