CLARIFICATIONS ON VDIS 1997
The Finance Act, 1997 has introduced a Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme, 1997. In regard to the Scheme a number of queries have been received from the public about the scope of the scheme and the procedure to be followed. The Board has considered the same and decided to clarify the points raised by issue of Circular in the form of questions and answers as per Annexure.
Clarifications on Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme, 1997
Question No. 1: Whether the undisclosed income represented by Jewellery acquired prior to 1-4-1987 is required to be disclosed at the market value as on 1-4-1987 ? (Please see section 64 and section 73 of the Finance Act, 1997)
Answer : Yes.
Question No. 2: Whether the undisclosed income represented by flat/land and machinery, shares, etc., acquired prior to 1-4-1987 is required to be disclosed at the market value as on 1-4-1987? (Please see sections 64 & 73)
Answer : No. The value should be as on the date of acquisition of the asset.
Question No. 3: Whether the undisclosed income can be declared by the minor after the assessment year 1992-93 or it is to be declared by his parents in whose hands it is taxable ?
Answer : Minor can declare his undisclosed income of 1992-93 or earlier assessment years. From Assessment year 1993-94, his income is includible in the parents’ income and he is not obliged to file a return himself. Only parents can declare the minor’s income for assessment year 1993-94 or later.
Question No. 4: Can undisclosed income be declared by the minor for the assessment year prior to 1992-93 in his own hands ? (Please see sections 63 & 64)
Answer : Yes, for reasons given in Question No. 3.
Question No. 5: If the firm had concealed income, can the partners file declaration in respect of such concealed income ?
Answer : The declaration will be by the firm verified by the managing partner. If there is no managing partner, then by one of the partners. The partners need not make declaration regarding their respective share of income.
Question No. 6: Where search and seizure action has taken place in Financial Year 1995-96, the block period is 1985-86 to 1995-96, can disclosure under the present scheme be made by the persons searched for an Assessment Year prior to 1985-86 ?
Answer : No. In respect of a case where search has taken place in any financial year, the person cannot make a declaration in respect of any previous year prior to the previous year in which search has taken place.
Question No. 7: Where a Private Limited Company has not filed return of income for Assessment Year 1990-91 in respect of its income as per books of account, can it file a declaration under the scheme and pay tax at 35% ?
Answer : Yes.
Question No. 8: Will there be a time limit under the VDIS, 1997 Scheme for the declarant to credit the declared income in the books of account and inform the Assessing Officer ?
Answer : There is no time limit under VDIS, 1997 Scheme for crediting the same declared vide section 64.
Question No. 9: Whether under the VDIS, 1997, it is mandatory to credit the amount declared in the books of accounts, if so, in which year’s books of account it has to be credited – Whether the Assessment Year in respect of which it is declared or the Assessment Year relevant to Financial Year 1997-98 ?
Answer : It is expected that the declarant will credit the amount declared in his books of account or if there are no books of account in some other record. The year of credit is left to the declarant’s option.
Question No. 10 : Will there be a time-limit under the Scheme for the CIT to issue the certificate ?
Answer : Apparently, there is no time limit for issue of a certificate. If the declared income relates to a pending assessment, then, the CIT will be obliged to issue the certificate before the date on which the said assessment gets barred by limitation of time.
[Commissioners have now been advised to issue the certificates within two days if taxes are paid in full.]
Question No. 11 : Will the declaration under the Scheme be final in itself or it will be final only on its being accepted by the Commissioner of Income-tax ?
Answer : In respect of a valid declaration, it will be final only when the certificate is issued by the CIT.
Question No. 12 : The immunity granted under the scheme should be along the lines of section 245H of the Income-tax Act, i.e., should be extended to immunity from penalty and prosecution under IPC and also any other Central Act. The Central Government should recommend to the State Governments that no proceeding be initiated under the State Acts like Sales Tax, Excise, i.e., in respect of entries credited in the books as a result of declarations made under the VDIS, 1997.
Answer : The question of recommending to the State Governments that no proceeding should be initiated under the Sales Tax Act does not arise because the disclosed income is just a lump sum not falling under any head of income like business and profession, capital gains or other sources. Hence, there is no presumption that disclosed income relates to suppressed turnover or suppressed manufacture.
Question No. 13 : Immunity should also be granted to Directors of a company, partners of the firm and members of the AOP which makes a declaration under the scheme.
Answer : As far as firms and AOPs are concerned, it is enough if firm and AOPs declare. There is no need for partners and members to declare separately in respect of the income declared by the firm or AOP. In respect of disclosure by the company, no director of the company shall be prosecuted.
Question No. 14 : In the case of ladies and minors making declaration and amounts are later credited the books of account of the firm, etc., it needs to be clarified as to what will be the view of the Department, particularly whether the Assessing Officer can investigate into the source of the amounts so credited ? (Refer Supreme Court decision in Rattan Lal’s case).
Answer : The declarant lady or minor should first credit the amount declared in their own books of account or any other record. Thereafter, the advance can be made to other persons. Where the amounts credited in the books of the other persons are equal to or less than the amount declared by the lady or the minor then the Assessing Officer should accept the credit entries in the books of the firm. If the amount credited is more than the amount declared the Assessing Officer will be free to enquire into such excess.
Question No. 15 : Under section 68 of the Scheme the amount of the voluntary disclosed income is not to be included in the total income of any assessment year if (a) such amount is credited in the books of account or any other record and the credit so made is intimated to the Assessing Officer and (b) income-tax is paid on such amount.
In such a case, three questions arise (i) what is the meaning of “any other record” particularly when declarant maintains no record ? (ii ) who will be the Assessing Officer – whether the regular AO or the designated officer in the office of the Commissioner ? and (iii ) what is meaning of “credited in the books of account” ?
Answer : ( i) Where books of account are not maintained by the declarant, any other record means an entry which will evidence the availability of amount declared.
( ii) The regular Assessing Officer of the territory and not the designated officer in the office of the Commissioner of Income-tax.
( iii) The meaning of credit in the books of account will vary from case to case depending upon the nature of the disclosure whether it is under-statement of stock or under-statement of turnover or under-statement of sale consideration of a property, etc.
Question No. 16 : Will the value of assets declared be accepted by the Department as it is or will it be necessary to file a valuer’s certificate along with the declaration ? Can the matter be referred by the Department to Valuation Cell ? Is any evidence required to be filed regarding the year or purchase of the jewellery or other assets ? Whether the value of jewellery as on 1-4-1987 will be adopted only for purposes of VDIS or will it also be adopted for Wealth Tax in subsequent years ?
Answer : In respect of immovable property, the Department will not insist upon any valuation certificate along with the declaration. It is the responsibility of the declarant to declare the correct value. In respect of the jewellery if it has been acquired prior to 1-4-1987, the value will be taken as on 1-4-1987 as certified by valuer. Further, the value adopted as on 1-4-1987 is for the limited purpose of the scheme.
Question No. 17 : In the case of sale of immovable property,—
(a ) if the purchaser declares the “black” portion under the scheme, what will be the position of the seller ? Will the department proceed against him (seller) ?
(b ) if the property is sold subsequently, what will be the cost of acquisition ?
(c ) if, as a result of the declaration of the actual value of the property, it exceeds the limit laid down in Chapter XX-C, whether any proceedings will be initiated by Appropriate Authority ?
Answer : ( a) No.
(b) Cost of the acquisition as declared before the income-tax authorities and increased by the amount disclosed under the scheme in respect of the asset.
(c) Once the Appropriate Authority issues NOC u/s 269UL(1), his jurisdiction that transaction ceases. The Appropriate Authority cannot initiate any further proceedings.
Question No. 18 : As per section 65(3), only one declaration is permitted under the Scheme. Multiple declarations should be allowed to take care of certain situations, e.g., where piecemeal recoveries of undisclosed amounts are made from debtors ?
Answer : Only one declaration is permitted. Where piece-meal recovery of undisclosed amounts are made from debtors, the declarant may perhaps wait till the final recovery before the closure of the Scheme and then declare.
Question No. 19 : Whether wealth-tax will be chargeable on the assets declared only for Assessment year 1997-98 or also for earlier years ? Whether wealth-tax exemption will be available for subsequent years after the year of declaration ? In the case of a declaration for Assessment year 1997-98 whether wealth-tax exemption is available for Assessment year 1988-89 to Assessment year 1997-98 or not ? Whether the charge of wealth-tax @ 1% will be one-time or recurring ? (This provision has been deleted)
Answer : Under section 73(1)(c) of VDIS, 97 where an asset has been undervalued, and subsequently such under-valuation is disclosed, then to that extent wealth-tax is payable for the year of disclosure as well as earlier assessment year during which the asset was in existence. In respect of assets not at all disclosed, for subsequent assessment years, wealth-tax is payable.
For subsequent years, the value may change,
Question No. 20 : In the case of subsequent sale of assets declared under VDIS, whether the benefit of indexation will be available ? If yes, whether the cost of acquisition will be actual cost or the deemed cost as on 1-4-1987 ?
Answer : Yes. In case of jewellery, the cost of acquisition will be the actual cost and not deemed cost as 1-4-1987.
Question No. 21 : Section 64(2)( i) of the Scheme disentitles a person from making a declaration in respect of an assessment year, if for that assessment year a notice u/s 142 or 148 has been served upon him. What will be the position if a notice u/s 143(2) has been served ? Will it debar the assessee from making a declaration for that assessment year ?
Answer : Issue of section 143(2) notice is not a bar.
Question No. 22 : If an assessment is set aside in appeal, declaration for that assessment year should be permitted. If in the assessment proceedings, say any expenditure has been disallowed, whether this can be offered under VDIS after withdrawal of appeal?
Answer : This cannot be done.
[As regards assessments set aside in appeal, please refer to answer to Question No. 52. The Scheme does not provide for a declaration to be filed after withdrawing an appeal.]
Question No. 23 : The scope of the Scheme should be expanded so as to include cases where —
(a ) action u/ss 132, 133A has been taken.
(b ) appeal is withdrawn, as this will reduce litigation.
Answer : This is not possible. In respect of survey u/s 133A, the declarants are debarred for that previous year only.
[In respect of survey u/s 133A, the declarants are debarred for that previous year only. In respect of searches, please see reply to Question No. 6. NO disclosure can be made for any year by withdrawing an appeal – refer answer to Question No. 22 also.]
Question No. 24 : Say Rs. 100 is held abroad and declared under VDIS. Rs. 30 is paid as tax after remitting into India or out of Indian sources. Whether the balance Rs. 70 or the full Rs. 100, as the case may be, can be retained abroad or whether it must be brought into India before 31-12-1977 ?
Answer : The immunity from prosecution is against the commission of offence under FERA. It is not a permission for continuance of the offence.
Question No. 25 : Immunity has been granted under the Scheme only from penalty and prosecution, but interest has not been mentioned. It may be clarified that interest will not be charged in respect of declarations made under the Scheme for any assessment year ?
Answer : In respect of declared income a flat rate of 30% or 35%, as the case may be, is payable. No interest is payable except interest for late payment of tax on declared income.
Circular No. : 754, dated 10-6-1997
