No addition against Vyapam accused as surrendered income duly reflected in books of accounts

Vinod Bhandari Vs PCIT (ITAT Indore)

Conclusion: Where there were two funds one which was already taxed and other had not and there were remittances during the accounting year for a certain sum, the source of which was not indicated then the presumption was that the remittances should have been from the fund which had already suffered tax. Thus, assessee was entitled to the telescoping benefit of the income surrendered during the year to the cash deposited in the bank account as the surrendered income which was invested in hundis were r

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.