Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : The CIT & ITO Vs Smt. B S Shanthakumari (Karnataka High Court)
Appeal Number : Income tax (Appeal) No. 165 of 2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/07/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Sec. 54F – benefit allowed, on completing the major construction of resi. House rather fully habitable house property.

Brief of the Case

Karnataka High Court held In the case of The CIT & ITO vs. Smt. B S Shanthakumari that the essence of provisions u/s 54F is to ensure that assessee who received capital gains would invest the same by constructing a residential house and once it is established that consideration so received on transfer of his Long Term capital asset has invested in constructing residential house, it would satisfy the ingredients of Section 54F. If the assessee is able to establish that he had invested the entire net consideration within the stipulated period, it would meet the requirement of Section 54F and as such, assessee would be entitled to get the benefit of Section 54F of the Act.

Facts of the Case

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031