Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sri Venkateswara Reddy Kasireddy Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1930 & 1931/HYD/2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/06/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Facts of the Case

The assessee is an individual deriving income from house property and agriculture. The assessment was completed u/s 143(3) of the I.T. Act on 12.3.2013. During the course of the assessment proceedings, it was noticed that the assessee had received a loan of Rs.30.00 lakhs in cash on 10.05.2009 thereby violating the provisions of section 269S of the I.T. Act. Accordingly, penalty notice u/s 271D of the I.T. Act was issued to the assessee on 25.04.2013 which was duly served on the assessee.
Question of Law

Whether the ld. CIT(A) was justified in imposing the penalty in violation of section 269ss when there was a reasonable cause?

Contentions of the Assessee

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031