Case Law Details
Case Name : Shri Ch. Krishna Murthy Vs D.C.I.T. (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2002-03
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Hyderabad
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Advance received can’t be termed as a dividend under section 2(22)(e) when there was no accumulated profits available with company through which advance is alleged to be taken
Facts of the Case
Briefly stated, assessee is an individual and was covered in the search and seizure operations u/s 132 of the Act conducted on Vishnu Chemicals Group. Assessment for A.Y 2002-03 was completed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153A on 31.12.2009. Later the CIT (Central) Hyderabad treated the assessment order as erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue and has ordered for re-assessment u/s 263 of the ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

