Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri Ch. Krishna Murthy Vs D.C.I.T. (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2002-03
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Advance received can’t be termed as a dividend under section 2(22)(e) when there was no accumulated profits available with company through which advance is alleged to be taken Facts of the Case Briefly stated, assessee is an individual and was covered in the search and seizure operations u/s 132 of the Act conducted on Vishnu Chemicals Group. Assessment for A.Y 2002-03 was completed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153A on 31.12.2009. Later the CIT (Central) Hyderabad treated the assessment order as erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue and has ordered for re-assessment u/s 263 of the ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930