Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri Ch. Krishna Murthy Vs D.C.I.T. (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2002-03
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Advance received can’t be termed as a dividend under section 2(22)(e) when there was no accumulated profits available with company through which advance is alleged to be taken

Facts of the Case

Briefly stated, assessee is an individual and was covered in the search and seizure operations u/s 132 of the Act conducted on Vishnu Chemicals Group. Assessment for A.Y 2002-03 was completed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153A on 31.12.2009. Later the CIT (

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31